• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

AnshuBlog: The Stack Fallacy

Strategy, SaaS, Entrepreneurship and VC

Hide Search

The Stack Fallacy™: Why Big Companies Keep Failing

admin · January 23, 2016 · Leave a Comment

Stack Fallacy™ has caused so many companies to attempt to capture new markets and fail spectacularly. When you see a database company thinking apps are easy, or a VM company thinking big data is easy — they are suffering from Stack Fallacy.

Stack Fallacy™ is the mistaken belief that it is trivial to build the layer above yours. 
Source: http://xkcd.com/435/

Mathematicians often believe we can describe the entire natural world in mathematical terms. Hence, all of Physics is just applied math. And so on and so forth.

Stack Fallacy™ — “Just an App”
In the business world, we have a similar illusion. Database companies believe that SaaS apps are ‘just a database app’ — this gives them false confidence that they can easily build, compete and win in this new market. As history has shown, Amazon is dominating the cloud IaaS market even as the technology vendors that build ingredient, lower layer technologies struggle to compete — VMware is nowhere close to winning against AWS even though all of AWS runs on virtual machine technology, a core competency of VMware; Oracle has been unable to beat Salesforce in CRM SaaS despite the fact that Oracle perceives Salesforce to be just a hosted database app. It even runs on their database!
by Ananth Sharma, FlickR (Creative Commons)

Apple continues to successfully integrate vertically down — building chips, programming languages, etc. but again has found it very hard to go up the stack and build those simple apps — things like photo sharing apps and maps.

History is full of such examples. IBM thought nothing much of the software layer that ran their PC hardware layer and happily allowed Microsoft to own the OS market.

In ’90s, Larry Ellison saw SAP make gargantuan sums of money selling process automation software (ERP) — to him, ERP was nothing more than a bunch of tables & workflows — so he spent 100s of millions of dollars trying to own that market with mixed results. Eventually, Oracle bought its way into apps market by acquiring Peoplesoft & Siebel.

Why do we keep falling for the Stack Fallacy?
The Stack Fallacy™ is a result of human nature — we (over) value what we know. In real terms, imagine you work for a large database company — and the CEO asks — can we compete with Intel or SAP? Very few people will imagine that they can build a computer chip just because they can build relational database software but because of our familiarity with building blocks of the layer up — it is easy to believe you can build the ERP app. After all, we know tables & workflows. 

Often the bottleneck for success is not knowledge of the tools but lack of understanding of the customer needs.
Database engineers know almost nothing about what supply chain software customers want or need. They can hire for that but its not a core competency.

In a surprising way, its far easier to innovate down the stack than up the stack. 
The reason for this is that you are yourself a natural customer of the lower layers. Apple knew what it wanted from an ideal future microprocessor. It did not have the skills necessary to build it but the customer needs were well understood. Technical skills can be bought/acquired where as its very hard to just buy a deep understanding of market needs.
Its therefore no surprise that Apple had an easier time building semiconductor chips than building Apple Maps.

Google, Facebook, WhatsApp
Google is a great example here. It owned our email graph, it owned our interest data (search) and yet found it very difficult to succeed in what looks like a “trivial to build” app — social networks. 
In fact, this is the perfect irony of Stack Fallacy. You can build things higher up the stack. Its just that its often not clear what to build.

Product management is the art of knowing what to build.
The Stack Fallacy™provides insights into why companies keep failing at the obvious things — things so close to their reach that they can surely build. The answer may be: the what is 100x more important than the how.

Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Don’t Repeat the Benioff Mistake
  • Go forth and multiply — your apps.
  • Amazon: The Company with a 100 CEOs Cannot Be Stopped
  • Engineer’s Guide to Picking an Early Stage Startup
  • Riding with Nutanix from Day Zero

Recent Comments

  • Semusi on When Free is Not Really Free
  • Soren Lanng on Death of Native Apps on PC: Trillion Dollar Transfer from Microsoft to Apple
  • hipy on How do I find a co-Founder?
  • Unknown on Looking for an Illiterate Maid in India on Facebook Lite
  • Unknown on How do I find a co-Founder?

Archives

  • March 2020
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • September 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • October 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • March 2012
  • December 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • July 2009
  • April 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • September 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005

Categories

  • Amazon
  • AOL
  • Apple
  • bank
  • berkshire
  • Blackbox
  • blockbuster
  • Bluetooth
  • BRIC2.0
  • Britney
  • buffett
  • CEO
  • China
  • Chiquita
  • cisco
  • Compliance
  • Daily+Show
  • Darfur
  • Development
  • Dole
  • economics
  • Ecosystem
  • eloan
  • Enhanced+SaaS
  • Enterprise2.0
  • entrepreneur
  • ERP
  • Facebook
  • FlickR
  • force.com
  • Gapminder
  • Google
  • greencard
  • h1b
  • hayek
  • healthcare
  • HTMLDB
  • huawei
  • humor
  • IDC
  • Identity
  • IdM
  • iit
  • immigration
  • India
  • Infosys
  • Innovation
  • iPhoe
  • iPhone
  • iPod
  • irregulars
  • isv
  • Jajah
  • Jon+Stewart
  • khosla
  • KingDee
  • lending
  • lesson
  • LinkedIn
  • Linux
  • loans
  • mashup
  • Micropayments
  • Microsoft
  • Munger
  • myspace
  • netflix
  • netsuite
  • o2con
  • Office2.0
  • On-demand
  • OpenSocial
  • Openworld
  • openworld07
  • Oracle
  • ORCL
  • outsourcing
  • p2p
  • PaaS
  • Pakistan
  • power
  • Prahlad
  • Private+Equity
  • Prosper
  • Pyramid
  • Real Estate
  • RedHat
  • redshift
  • saas
  • salesforce
  • SAP
  • Schwartz
  • Security
  • Seth+Godin
  • Shakira
  • Skype
  • SOA
  • SOX
  • Stats
  • Sun
  • sunw
  • Tally
  • telco
  • Teqlo
  • The+Dip
  • tie
  • Time
  • Tool
  • UFIDA
  • Uncategorized
  • VC
  • venture
  • VMWare
  • water
  • Web2.0
  • webex
  • Wiki
  • workday
  • Yahoo
  • youtube
  • Zoho
  • zopa

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Hit the ground running with a minimalist look. Learn More

Copyright © 2021 - Anshu Sharma